• 首页
  • 创刊词
  • 期刊介绍
    • 杂志简介
    • 编委会
    • 编辑部
  • 过刊浏览
  • 杂志订阅
    • 订阅须知
    • 在线订阅
  • 在线投稿
    • 投稿指南
    • 年度选题
    • 在线投稿
  • 下载中心
  • 学术交流
    • 研究论坛
    • 学术沙龙
    • 编委会会议
  • 登录
    • 作者登录
    • 审稿登录
    • 编辑登录
    • 读者登录
引用本文:Peter C Smith,Anders Anell,Reinhard Busse,等.七个发达国家卫生系统的领导与治理[J].中国卫生政策研究,2012,5(11):1-11
七个发达国家卫生系统的领导与治理
投稿时间:2012-09-10  修订日期:2012-09-20  PDF全文浏览  HTML全文浏览
Peter C Smith1, Anders Anell2, Reinhard Busse3, Luca Crivelli4, Judith Healy5, Anne Karin Lindah6, Gert Westert7, Tobechukwu Kene1
1.帝国理工学院;2.隆德大学经济与管理学院;3.柏林理工大学;4.意大利语区大学;5.澳大利亚国立大学;6.挪威卫生服务知识中心;7.奈梅亨大学医学中心
摘要:本文运用结构式调查方法,探讨了澳大利亚、英国、德国、荷兰、挪威、瑞典和瑞士七个发达国家卫生系统的领导和治理情况。领导与治理模式包含三项基本职能:优先顺序设置、绩效监管和问责制。各国卫生系统的领导和治理方法存在着显著差异,零散并略显随意。虽然各国在卫生系统的总体目标上达成了共识,但设置优先顺序的途径各不相同。成本效益分析作为设置卫生系统运行优先顺序的一个主要方法被各国加以广泛运用,但并未发挥核心作用。各国虽然处于不同的发展阶段,但绩效监管却能广泛吸收有益意见。问责制特别是在最优方法的不确定性方面,各国之间的差异最大。大多数情况下,市场机制、选举程序、直接经济激励以及专业监督与控制等几种不同问责机制的组合可能更为合适。而且这些机制应与优先顺序设置和绩效监管协调一致。
关键词:领导  治理  卫生系统  问责制
Leadership and governance in seven developed health systems
Abstract:This paper uses a structured survey to explore leadership and governance arrangements in seven developed health systems:Australia, England,Germany,the Netherlands,Norway,Sweden and Switzerland It presents a cybernetic model of leadership and governance comprising three fundamental functions:priority setting,performance monitoring and accountability arrangements Approaches to leadership and governance vary substantially,and have to date been developed piecemeal and somewhat arbitrarily Although there seems to be reasonable consensus on broad goals of the health system there is variation in approaches to setting priorities Cost effectiveness analysis is in widespread use as a basis for operational priority setting, but rarely plays a central role Performance monitoring may be the domain where there is most convergence of thinking,although countries are at different stages of development The third domain of accountability is where the greatest variation occurs,and where there is greatest uncertainty about the optimal approach We conclude that a judicious mix of accountability mechanisms is likely to be appropriate in most settings,including market mechanisms, electoral processes,direct financial incentives,and professional oversight and control The mechanisms should be aligned with the priority setting and monitoring processes
Key words:Leadership  Governance  Health systems  Accountability
摘要点击次数: 2741    全文下载次数: 3718
版权所有:《中国卫生政策研究》编辑部
您是本站第62139253位读者 今日访问2080次
京ICP备10218182号-6

京公网安备 11010502037852号