| 引用本文：高娉,李杰,陈少鹏,等.河北省城市医院支援乡镇卫生院模式效果的综合评价[J].中国卫生政策研究,2013,6(7):33-37 |
|
| 河北省城市医院支援乡镇卫生院模式效果的综合评价 |
| 投稿时间：2013-05-06 修订日期：2013-07-05 PDF全文浏览 HTML全文浏览 |
| 高娉1, 李杰2, 陈少鹏3, 薛鹏4, 席彪5 |
| 1.河北医科大学公共卫生学院;2.河北省秦皇岛市抚宁县疾病预防控制中心;3.河北省人民医院;4.河北医科大学第三医院;5.河北省卫生厅 |
| 摘要:目的：比较城市医院支援乡镇卫生院8种模式的效果。方法：抽取32个乡镇卫生院作为评估样本，采用综合评分法、TOPSIS法、秩和比法对各乡镇卫生院所对应的支援模式进行综合评价，并采用均值组合评价法对结果进行组合。结果：根据组合评价的结果，优选出了3种支援模式，分别是驻点帮扶、协作关系和进修，其得分分别为767、700和633。结论：四种综合评价方法在评价结果中的一致性较好，在实际工作中，应以3种最佳支援模式为主，其它5种支援模式为辅，争取达到最佳支援效果。 |
| 关键词:城市医院 乡镇卫生院 支援模式 综合评价 |
| 基金项目:亚洲银行支援项目（TA7313 PRC） |
|
| Synthetic evaluation on the effect of urban hospitals supporting model to township health center in Hebei Province |
|
|
| Abstract:Objective: Compare the effect of eight models of urban hospitals support to township health center. Methods: 32 township health center samples were selected, and Integrative measure, Topsis method and Rank Sum Ratio (RSR) method were applied to evaluate the survey data, and mean value synthetic evaluation was combined to analyzed. Results: According to the result of mean value synthetic evaluation, 3 supporting models of which are stationary point, cooperation relationships and further studying should be selected preferentially. There scores were 767, 700 and 633, respectively. Conclusion: The results from different evaluation methods are similar. The best 3 should be chief supporting models, and the other 5 should be the subordinate. |
| Key words:Urban hospital Township health center Supporting models Synthetic evaluation |
| 摘要点击次数: 1513 全文下载次数: 1402 |
|
|
|
|
|
