| 引用本文：杨昊旻, 刘培龙, 郭岩.中国和印度对尼泊尔卫生发展援助模式的比较[J].中国卫生政策研究,2014,7(7):17-23 |
|
| 中国和印度对尼泊尔卫生发展援助模式的比较 |
| 投稿时间：2014-03-25 修订日期：2014-04-11 PDF全文浏览 HTML全文浏览 |
| 杨昊旻, 刘培龙, 郭岩 |
| 北京大学公共卫生学院 北京 100191 |
| 摘要:目的：通过比较中国和印度对尼泊尔卫生发展援助模式的异同和引起差异的原因，探讨印度值得中国学习的援助策略。方法：利用文献综述和关键人深入访谈法实施研究。通过中国、印度和尼泊尔提供和接受援助的部门网站和官员，获取文献资料；以滚雪球式的寻找方式，对中国和印度在尼泊尔卫生发展援助项目的知情人进行个人深入访谈。结果：中国和印度具有共同的援助基本原则，但在实施政策时存在差异，印度的卫生发展援助同其整体援助目标更相关。中国和印度对卫生发展援助的组织管理机构不同、决策层不同，援助协调性有所差异。结论：南亚的地缘政治和历史因素影响到援助模式的选择，中国对尼泊尔的卫生发展援助同领域两部门管理的现状导致了援助协调问题。 |
| 关键词:卫生发展援助 援助模式 中国 印度 |
|
| Comparative study of Chinese and Indian aid models in development assistance for health to Nepal |
| YANG Hao-min, LIU Pei-long, GUO Yan |
| School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China |
| Abstract:Objectives: This study aims to compare the different aid models of Chinese and Indian DAH to Nepal, indicate the reasons for differences, and provide suggestions for China. Methods: This research will adopt a literature review and in-depth individual interviews to gain materials necessary for comparison. Literature is drawn from the websites and reports of related Chinese, Indian, and Nepalese government agencies. The snowballing effect is used to determine key informants for Chinese and Indian DAH to Nepal. Results: China and India are alike in aid principles but differ in implementation. However, Indian DAH programs are closer to overall assistance goals than Chinese programs. Indian DAH programs are also different from Chinese programs in terms of organization, decision-making procedures, and coordination. Conclusions: Geopolitics and historical connections influence Chinese and Indian aid models, and the dual authority of Chinese DAH programs impedes aid coordination. |
| Key words:Development Assistance for health Aid model China India |
| 摘要点击次数: 3169 全文下载次数: 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
