引用本文:孙梅, 吴丹, 施建华, 李程跃, 吕军, 苏忠鑫, 宁宁, 张建华, 徐鹏, 郝模.我国突发公共卫生事件应急处置政策变迁:2003—2013年[J].中国卫生政策研究,2014,7(7):24-29 |
|
我国突发公共卫生事件应急处置政策变迁:2003—2013年 |
投稿时间:2014-06-11 修订日期:2014-07-01 PDF全文浏览 HTML全文浏览 |
孙梅1, 吴丹1, 施建华2, 李程跃1, 吕军1, 苏忠鑫3, 宁宁4, 张建华5, 徐鹏6, 郝模1 |
1. 复旦大学卫生发展战略研究中心 上海 200032; 2. 上海市徐汇区疾病预防控制中心 上海 200031; 3. 复旦大学公共管理与公共政策研究国家哲学社会科学创新基地 上海 200433; 4. 哈尔滨医科大学卫生管理学院 黑龙江哈尔滨 150086; 5. 潍坊医学院管理学院 山东潍坊 261053; 6. 中国疾病预防控制中心性病艾滋病预防控制中心 北京 102206 |
摘要:2003年SARS疫情以后,突发公共卫生事件应急处置工作得到高度重视,相关政策文件也在逐步完善。本文系统检索了我国十年来颁布的近百项国家层面的突发公共卫生事件应急处置政策,并从应急预案制订、应急队伍组建与培训、应急物资保障、信息报告要求、现场处置分工、应急评估工作和治理方式七个方面进行政策变迁分析。研究发现:十年来,突发公共卫生事件应急处置政策逐步细化,详细规定了应急预案的内容;明确了应急队伍构成和队伍培训工作内容;加强了应急物资保障制度的建设;明晰了应急现场处置各方职责;逐步重视应急处置的评估工作。但突发公共卫生事件应急处置仍以被动治理为主,且相关政策缺乏操作性,物资配备标准适用性差,时效性差。需及时转变理念,完善更新突发公共卫生应急处置政策及相关规范、标准。 |
关键词:突发公共卫生事件 应急处置 政策变迁 |
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(71373004、71003025、71303058);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20120071110055);卫生公益性行业科研专项基金(201002028);国家社科基金重点项目(13AZD081);教育部创新团队发展计划(IRT_13R11);复旦大学“985工程”三期整体推进社会科学研究项目(2012SHKXQN008);复旦大学上海医学院应急课题;健康领域社会风险预测治理协同创新中心项目 |
|
Policies change related to public health emergency disposal in China:From 2003 to 2013 |
SUN Mei1, WU Dan1, SHI Jian-hua2, LI Cheng-yue1, LV Jun1, SU Zhong-xin3, NING Ning4, ZHANG Jian-hua5, XU Peng6, HAO Mo1 |
1. Research Institute of Health Development Strategies, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; 2. Shanghai Xuhui District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 200031, China; 3. National Social Science Innovative Research Base of Public Management and Policy of Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China; 4. Health Management College of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Heilongjiang 150086, China; 5. School of Management, Weifang Medical College, Weifang Shandong 261053, China; 6. National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention, China CDC, Beijing 102206, China |
Abstract:Great attention had been paid to public health emergency after SARS outbroken 2003, related policies had been gradually perfected.Policies issued on the national level from 2003 to 2013 had been searched and analyzed from emergency plan establishing, emergency team organization and training, emergency material storage, information report rules, field disposal arrangement, emergency assessment to governance methods.It can be concluded that in the past ten years, public health emergency policies had been elaborated, emergency plan contents had been detailed, emergency team organization and training had been explicited, emergency material storage regulations had been enhanced, the responsibility of every unit in field disposal had been cleared, emergency assessment had been emphasized.But public health emergency disposal is dominated passively.Related policies lack of operability.Material standards lack of applicability and timeliness.Govern concept should be changed, disposal policies and standards should be perfected and renewed. |
Key words:Public health emergency Emergency disposal Policy change |
摘要点击次数: 2877 全文下载次数: 8 |
|
|
|
|
|