| 引用本文：何柳, 董四平, 李萌, 郭淑岩.医师多点执业研究述评——基于内容分析法[J].中国卫生政策研究,2014,7(10):52-57 |
|
| 医师多点执业研究述评——基于内容分析法 |
| 投稿时间：2014-04-25 修订日期：2014-09-25 PDF全文浏览 HTML全文浏览 |
| 何柳1,2, 董四平1,2, 李萌1, 郭淑岩1 |
1. 卫生部医院管理研究所 北京 100191;
2. 武汉大学政治与公共管理学院 湖北武汉 430072 |
| 摘要:目的:了解医师多点执业相关研究进展,明确进一步研究方向.方法:检索中国知网、万方数据库、重庆维普数据库1949—2013年我国医师多点执业相关文献,分析密切相关文献数量,对被引频数不小于1次的文献进行内容分析.结果:从文献数量上看2009年之后医师多点执业相关研究明显增多,但很大程度上是中央政策引导的结果,研究相对政策推进存在一定滞后性;从文献内容上看现有研究存在缺乏对政策本身及配套政策分析、国际比较研究较少,相关法律问题不明确,多主体角度及实证研究不充分等不足.建议:加强多点执业政策本身及配套政策分析,注重医师执业制度国际比较研究,强化相关法律法规研究,开展相关利益主体多角度研究,重视以定量分析为基础的实证研究. |
| 关键词:医师多点执业 内容分析法 述评 |
|
| Literature review of multiple-site physician practice: Based on content analysis |
| HE Liu1,2, DONG Si-ping1,2, LI Meng1, GUO Shu-yan1 |
1. National Institute of Hospital Administration, Beijing 100191, China;
2. School of Politics and Public Administration, Wuhan University, Wuhan Hubei 430072, China |
| Abstract:Objectives: This study aims to summarize the research progress of multiple-site physician practice to determine further research directions. Methods: Literature on Chinese multiple-site physician practice between 1949 and 2013 was obtained from CNKI, Wan fang database and CQVIP database, the annual volume distribution of selected documents was been described and the topics and content of literature cited at least once were summarized through literature content analysis. Results: The volume of literature increased rapidly from 2009, guided by related government policies. Content analysis is insufficient in the research areas of supporting policies, international experiences, relevant laws and empirical studies. Suggestions: Further research should focus on multiple-site physician practice policies themselves and supporting policy analysis, international comparisons of multiple-site physician practice systems, studies into relevant laws and regulations and empirical studies based on quantitative methods. |
| Key words:Multiple-site physician practice Content analysis Research review |
| 摘要点击次数: 3333 全文下载次数: 1899 |
|
|
|
|
|
