| 引用本文：Ketan Shank ardass, Emilie Renahy, Carles Muntaner, Patricia O'Campo.加强“将健康融入所有政策”的实施:基于现实主义的 解释性案例研究[J].中国卫生政策研究,2015,8(3):72-81 |
|
| 加强“将健康融入所有政策”的实施:基于现实主义的 解释性案例研究 |
| 投稿时间：2015-01-26 修订日期：2015-03-26 PDF全文浏览 HTML全文浏览 |
| Ketan Shank ardass1,2,3, Emilie Renahy2, Carles Muntaner2,3,4, Patricia O'Campo2,3 |
1. 威尔弗里德·劳雷尔大学心理学系 加拿大滑铁卢 N2L 3C5;
2. 圣米高医院都市健康研究中心 加拿大多伦多 M5B 1W8;
3. 多伦多大学达拉拉纳公共卫生学院 加拿大多伦多 M5S 2J7;
4. 多伦多大学布隆伯格护理学院 加拿大多伦多 M5S 2J7 |
| 摘要:目前, 世界各国普遍采取跨部门行动解决健康的宏观社会和经济决定因素。“将健康融入所有政策(HiAP)”是各国采取跨部门行动的策略之一, 它以广义的健康决定因素而非单纯的卫生服务为目标, 在决策过程中系统解决健康问题。近几十年来出现了很多关于HiAP的案例, 但这些案例成功或失败的原因并未得到系统的研究, 这就导致以证据为基础的有关促进或阻碍HiAP策略实施的相关因素的研究较少。本文基于现实主义视角, 采用解释性案例研究, 分析了不同地区HiAP策略的实施情况。本研究在提出概念性框架的基础上, 分析了与HiAP可持续实施有关的背景、社会机制及结果, 并利用相关文献以及从关键知情人访谈中得到的证据, 寻找相关的模式和主题对现象加以解释。最后, 通过对瑞典和加拿大魁北克实施卫生影响力评估的情况进行比较, 揭示了HiAP成功实施的经验。此方法能够帮助研究者对某一地区内成功实施HiAP的社会机制和背景因素的大量证据信息加以审核并做三角测量, 还可用于分析其他形式的部门间行动, 以减少不同背景、不同地区之间的卫生不公平性现象。 |
| 关键词:卫生政策 执行 健康促进 公平性 决定因素 社会决定因素 社会流行病学 |
| 基金项目:加拿大卫生研究协会资助项目(111608);安大略省卫生部资助项目(96566) |
|
| Strengthening the implementation of Health in All Policies: A methodology for realist explanatory case studies |
| Ketan Shank ardass1,2,3, Emilie Renahy2, Carles Muntaner2,3,4, Patricia O'Campo2,3 |
1. Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo N2L 3C5, Canada;
2. Centre for Research on Inner City Health, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto M5B 1W8, Canada;
3. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto Toronto M5S 2J7 Canada;
4. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 2J7 Canada |
| Abstract:To address macro-social and economic determinants of health and equity, there has been growing use of intersectoral action by governments around the world. Health in All Policies (HiAP) initiatives are a special case where governments use cross-sectoral structures and relationships to systematically address health in policymaking by targeting broad health determinants rather than health services alone. Although many examples of HiAP have emerged in recent decades, the reasons for their successful implementation—and for implementation failures—have not been systematically studied. Consequently, rigorous evidence based on systematic research of the social mechanisms that have regularly enabled or hindered implementation in different jurisdictions is sparse. We describe a novel methodology for explanatory case studies that use a scientific realist perspective to study the implementation of HiAP. Our methodology begins with the formulation of a conceptual framework to describe contexts, social mechanisms and outcomes of relevance to the sustainable implementation of HiAP. We then describe the process of systematically explaining phenomena of interest using evidence from literature and key informant interviews, and looking for patterns and themes. Finally, we present a comparative example of how Health Impact Assessment tools have been utilized in Sweden and Quebec to illustrate how this methodology uses evidence to first describe successful practices for implementation of HiAP and then refine the initial framework. The methodology that we describe helps researchers to identify and triangulate rich evidence describing social mechanisms and salient contextual factors that characterize successful practices in implementing HiAP in specific jurisdictions. This methodology can be applied to study the implementation of HiAP and other forms of intersectoral action to reduce health inequities involving multiple geographic levels of government in diverse settings. |
| Key words:Health policy Implementation Health promotion Equity Determinants Social Determinants Social epidemiology |
| 摘要点击次数: 2614 全文下载次数: 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
