• 首页
  • 创刊词
  • 期刊介绍
    • 杂志简介
    • 编委会
    • 编辑部
  • 过刊浏览
  • 杂志订阅
    • 订阅须知
    • 在线订阅
  • 在线投稿
    • 投稿指南
    • 年度选题
    • 在线投稿
  • 下载中心
  • 学术交流
    • 研究论坛
    • 学术沙龙
    • 编委会会议
  • 登录
    • 作者登录
    • 审稿登录
    • 编辑登录
    • 读者登录
引用本文:高丛珊, 史宇鹏.药品集中招标采购政策的实施效果——基于中标企业数量与中标价格的实证分析[J].中国卫生政策研究,2015,8(12):7-13
药品集中招标采购政策的实施效果——基于中标企业数量与中标价格的实证分析
投稿时间:2015-10-24  修订日期:2015-12-06  PDF全文浏览  HTML全文浏览
高丛珊, 史宇鹏
中央财经大学 北京 102206
摘要:目的:从中标企业数量与中标价格的关系角度分析药品集中招标采购政策的实施效果。方法:检索31个省市自治区药品集中招标采购中标结果,采用最小二乘回归方法定量分析药品中标企业数量对中标价格的影响。结果:与直觉相反,中标企业数量与药品中标价格呈现出正向关系;相对于基本药物组,非基本药物组中药品中标企业数量对中标价格的影响更大。结论:现行的药品集中招标采购政策仍需进一步完善。
关键词:药品价格  药品集中招标采购  中标企业数量
The impacts of medicine centralized bidding and purchasing policy: An empirical study on the relationship between the bid winners and the bidden prices
GAO Cong-shan, SHI Yu-peng
Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 102206, China
Abstract:Objective: This paper aims to analyze the impacts of medicine centralized bidding and purchasing policy based on the relationship between the bid winners and the bidden prices. Methods: A data collection method was used to collect data from medicine centralized bidding and purchasing policy in 31 provinces and OLS method has been employed to analyze impacts of the number of bid winners on the medicine prices. Results: The results showed a positive correlation between the number of bid winners and the bidden prices, which was a counter-intuitive appeal. In the group of non-essential medicines, the number of bid winners had a stronger impact on the bidden prices than in the group of essential medicines. Conclusions: The current medicine centralized bidding and purchasing policy does not achieve the expected objective and needs to be further improved.
Key words:Medicines price  Medicine centralized bidding and purchasing policy  Bid winners
摘要点击次数: 3153    全文下载次数: 8
版权所有:《中国卫生政策研究》编辑部
您是本站第62196283位读者 今日访问2005次
京ICP备10218182号-6

京公网安备 11010502037852号