| 引用本文：姜荣勤, 李静娴, 胡丹, 葛爱晨, 陈家应.部分国家与中国医院绩效评估比较分析[J].中国卫生政策研究,2016,9(12):62-67 |
|
| 部分国家与中国医院绩效评估比较分析 |
| 投稿时间：2016-06-09 修订日期：2016-11-29 PDF全文浏览 HTML全文浏览 |
| 姜荣勤, 李静娴, 胡丹, 葛爱晨, 陈家应 |
| 南京医科大学医政学院 江苏南京 210029 |
| 摘要:本研究旨在将美国、英国、澳大利亚、荷兰等国家的医院绩效评估工具与我国的绩效评估现状进行比较分析，以期为我国开发统一的医院绩效评估体系提供理论依据。经研究后发现，我国在开发医院绩效评估指标体系时需要基于患者视角、组建固定的第三方绩效评估机构，建立有效的激励机制和反馈机制以及多种方式相结合的评估体系。 |
| 关键词:医院管理 绩效评估 评估方法 经验 |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金（71473129）；江苏省教育厅社会科学研究项目（2015SJB160） |
|
| Comparative analysis on the performance evaluation of hospitals between China and some countries |
| JIANG Rong-qin, LI Jing-xian, HU Dan, GE Ai-chen, CHEN Jia-ying |
| School of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Jiangsu 210029, China |
| Abstract:This study aimed at comparing the United States, Britain, Australia, the Netherlands and China's national performance evaluation, and sum up the experience to provide a theoretical basis for the China's development of hospital performance evaluation system. The study found that China needs to consider the patient's perspective, to establish a fixed third-party performance evaluation agencies, establish an effective incentive mechanism and feedback mechanism and combine a variety of assessment methods in the development of hospital performance evaluation index system. |
| Key words:Hospitals management Performance evaluation Assessment methods Experience |
| 摘要点击次数: 1823 全文下载次数: 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
