• 首页
  • 创刊词
  • 期刊介绍
    • 杂志简介
    • 编委会
    • 编辑部
  • 过刊浏览
  • 杂志订阅
    • 订阅须知
    • 在线订阅
  • 在线投稿
    • 投稿指南
    • 年度选题
    • 在线投稿
  • 下载中心
  • 学术交流
    • 研究论坛
    • 学术沙龙
    • 编委会会议
  • 登录
    • 作者登录
    • 审稿登录
    • 编辑登录
    • 读者登录
引用本文:宋乐薇, 姚岚, 陈山泉, 张颖, 巩方旭, 咸越, 项莉.传染病医疗费用保障现状及完善策略:以肺结核为例[J].中国卫生政策研究,2016,9(12):68-72
传染病医疗费用保障现状及完善策略:以肺结核为例
投稿时间:2016-10-09  修订日期:2016-12-08  PDF全文浏览  HTML全文浏览
宋乐薇1, 姚岚1, 陈山泉2, 张颖1, 巩方旭1, 咸越1, 项莉1
1. 华中科技大学同济医学院医药卫生管理学院 湖北武汉 430030;
2. 香港中文大学赛马会公共卫生学院 中国香港
摘要:目的:以肺结核为例分析我国传染病医疗费用的保障水平,为完善相关保障策略提出建议。方法:利用UHC政策分析框架,从覆盖人群、覆盖项目和保障程度三个维度分析医保、免费诊疗政策和医疗救助对肺结核患者的保障水平。结果:新农合对肺结核住院患者的实际补偿比低于对全部患者的整体实际补偿比,门诊患者比住院患者补偿水平更低;免费药可及性高,但药品种类局限,利用率不如预期;医疗救助率高,覆盖面窄,无法提高肺结核患者整体保障水平。结论:医保对传染病患者的医疗费用保障水平有限;传染病治疗是准公共产品,应强化政府在医保、免费诊疗政策和医疗救助的责任,进一步提高传染病的医疗费用保障水平。
关键词:传染病  医疗保险  免费诊疗政策  医疗救助  政府责任
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(71573095)
Review of the present situation and improvement of the level of reimbursement related to infectious diseases medical care: Take tuberculosis as an example
SONG Le-wei1, YAO Lan1, CHEN Shan-quan2, ZHANG Ying1, GONG Fang-xu1, XIAN Yue1, XIANG Li1
1. School of Medicine and Health Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan Hubei 430030, China;
2. The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, the Chinese University of HongKong, Hongkong, China
Abstract:Purpose:Taking tuberculosis as an example, this paper aims at to analyzing the level of reimbursement for infectious diseases care, and clarifying the government responsibility. Methods:In order to achieve the objective of this research, UHC framework was used to analyze the security level. Result:The findings of this research reveal that TB in-patients' Compensation Ratio of the New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) was lower than average level of all the NCMS patients, the out-patients' was even lower. The categories of anti-tuberculotic for free was limited, the utilization was not as expected. Medical assistance covered few people in spite of its high level of reimbursement. Conclusion:Based on the findings of this review, it has been revealed that the medical insurance didn't make a big difference in financial protection for patients with infectious diseases. As the treatment for of infectious diseases is a quasi-public good, the government has to shoulder the responsibility of improving the compensation ratio of the patients.
Key words:Infectious diseases  Medical insurance  Anti-tuberculotic for free  Medical assistance  Government responsibility
摘要点击次数: 1729    全文下载次数: 5
版权所有:《中国卫生政策研究》编辑部
您是本站第62139184位读者 今日访问2038次
京ICP备10218182号-6

京公网安备 11010502037852号