• 首页
  • 创刊词
  • 期刊介绍
    • 杂志简介
    • 编委会
    • 编辑部
  • 过刊浏览
  • 杂志订阅
    • 订阅须知
    • 在线订阅
  • 在线投稿
    • 投稿指南
    • 年度选题
    • 在线投稿
  • 下载中心
  • 学术交流
    • 研究论坛
    • 学术沙龙
    • 编委会会议
  • 登录
    • 作者登录
    • 审稿登录
    • 编辑登录
    • 读者登录
引用本文:杨涵, 肖洁, 胡明.我国基本药物循证遴选评价指标体系的构建[J].中国卫生政策研究,2017,10(12):33-38
我国基本药物循证遴选评价指标体系的构建
投稿时间:2017-06-29  修订日期:2017-10-25  PDF全文浏览  HTML全文浏览
杨涵, 肖洁, 胡明
四川大学华西药学院 四川成都 610041
摘要:目的:建立我国基本药物循证遴选指标体系和量化方法。方法:(1)文献研究:通过文献学习建立初步指标体系,经专家论证后,对指标进行调整,构建最终指标体系;(2)层次分析法:通过专家调查法,由专家对指标所构成的判断矩阵进行两两打分,确定各指标的权重。结果:对一级指标作出调整,同时对二级指标进行细化,提高其可操作性,最终建立的指标体系中包括一级指标8个,二级指标18个。结论:本研究建立的评价指标体系可用于评价基本药物目录收录的药品,为我国遴选基本药物目录的专家提供遴选证据。
关键词:基本药物目录  循证遴选  评价指标  层次分析法
基金项目:国家卫生计生委药政司委托课题(药政2015〔13〕号;药政〔2016〕19号);国家自然科学基金项目(71473170)
Construction of evaluation index system for evidence based selection of essential medicines in China
YANG Han, XIAO Jie, HU Ming
West China School of Pharmacy, Sichan University, Chengdu Sichuan 610041, China
Abstract:Objective:To establish an evaluation index system and quantitative method of evidence-based selection of essential medicines in China and use Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to construct the weight of the index. Methods:Through the expert consultation method, the initial index system was established, after the experts argument on the matrix of every two points, adjust the indicators, build the final index system, and then through the AHP, by the experts to determine the weight of the indicators. Results:Based on the literature study and expert consultation, the evaluation index system and its weight of the selection criteria of the basic drug were established. There are 8 indexes in the first-level indicators and the weight distribution was from high to low, the efficacy, safety, clinical guideline recommendation, quality reliability, economy, ease of use, list included, and availability. The secondary indicators include 18 indexes. To improve the operability, the first level indicators are adjusted while the second level indicators are refined simultaneously. Conclusion:The index evaluation system determined by expert argumentation and analytic hierarchy process in this study can be used to evaluate the medicines listed in the essential drug list and provide evidence for selection of essential medicines in China. It has certain theoretical feasibility. The empirical research shows that the index also has practical operability and can be improved.
Key words:Essential medicine list  Evidence-based selection  Evaluation index  Analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
摘要点击次数: 1954    全文下载次数: 20
版权所有:《中国卫生政策研究》编辑部
您是本站第61970063位读者 今日访问3304次
京ICP备10218182号-6

京公网安备 11010502037852号