| 引用本文：龚韩湘, 吴泽墉, 伍宝玲, 陈爱云, 赵嘉林, 罗桢妮.我国养老服务模式社会关注度的时空差异分析[J].中国卫生政策研究,2018,11(5):17-21 |
|
| 我国养老服务模式社会关注度的时空差异分析 |
| 投稿时间：2017-03-20 修订日期：2017-11-21 PDF全文浏览 HTML全文浏览 |
| 龚韩湘1, 吴泽墉2, 伍宝玲1, 陈爱云1, 赵嘉林1, 罗桢妮1 |
1. 广州医科大学卫生管理学院 广东广州 511436;
2. 南方医科大学第五附属医院 广东广州 510900 |
| 摘要:目的：分析我国养老服务模式社会关注度的时空差异性，以期为养老服务相关政策的制定提供依据。方法：利用百度指数获取2011—2016年养老服务模式社会关注度数据，并进行相关分析、回归分析、聚类分析和ArcGIS空间差异性分析。结果：居家养老的社会关注度最高，其次是社区养老，机构养老最低；养老服务模式社会关注度与网民人数、互联网普及率、人均可支配收入、每万人口全科医师数、每千人口卫生技术人员数和每十万人口高等教育人员数有关；北京市的公众关注度最高，其次是广东、浙江、江苏、上海和山东五省市；华北和华东地区公众关注度最高，其次是华中地区，西南和西北地区最低。结论：我国养老服务模式社会关注度不断上升，并且具有显著的省域和区域差异。 |
| 关键词:养老服务模式 社会关注度 百度指数 时空差异 |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目（71503057）；广东省自然科学基金项目（2015A030310475） |
|
| Analysis on the spatial and temporal differences in social concern of pension service model in China |
| GONG Han-xiang1, WU Ze-yong2, WU Bao-ling1, CHEN Ai-yun1, ZHAO Jia-lin1, LUO Zhen-ni1 |
1. School of Health Service Management, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Guangdong 511436, China;
2. The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou Guangdong 510900, China |
| Abstract:Objective:To analyze the spatial and temporal differences in the social concern of the pension service model in China so as to provide a basis for formulating relevant policies. Methods:To obtain data from the social concern of the pension service model during the period from 2011 to 2016, Baidu index was used and the correlation, regression, cluster and ArcGIS spatial disparity analyses were conducted. Results:The highest social concern is for those elderly people who must be cared home, and the chronology continues with community elderly and pension institutions presenting the lowest social concern, i.e. as care needs decrease the severity of social concern decreases too. The social concern was related to the number of Internet users or netizens, Internet penetration rate, per capita disposable income, the total number of doctors per million people, the number of technical personnel per thousand people and the number of higher education personnel per one hundred thousand people. Taking local governments into consideration, Beijing has the highest public concern, followed by Guangdong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Shanghai and Shandong. In regards to the regions of China, the Northern and Eastern regions presented highest degree of public concern, followed by the central, southwestern and Northwestern regions, respectively. Conclusions:Pension service model presents an increasing trend when it comes to social concern, and significant provincial and regional differences are highlighted. |
| Key words:Pension service model Social concern Baidu index Temporal and spatial difference |
| 摘要点击次数: 2003 全文下载次数: 908 |
|
|
|
|
|
