| 引用本文：崔宇杰, 赵汗青, 刘国恩, 何泱泱, 王梦潇, 杨茂睿.可跨国比较的中国医院管理调查体系的构建研究[J].中国卫生政策研究,2018,11(6):1-7 |
|
| 可跨国比较的中国医院管理调查体系的构建研究 |
| 投稿时间：2018-01-09 修订日期：2018-03-21 PDF全文浏览 HTML全文浏览 |
| 崔宇杰1, 赵汗青2, 刘国恩1, 何泱泱3, 王梦潇1, 杨茂睿2 |
1. 北京大学国家发展研究院 北京 100871;
2. 北京大学中国卫生经济研究中心 北京 100871;
3. 重庆工商大学 重庆 400067 |
| 摘要:为了解中国医院的管理水平以及国际定位，本研究团队根据国际上已广泛使用的世界管理调查方法论，研发了中国医院管理调查工具（Chinese hospital management survey，CHMS），包括20个管理实践的调查项目，涵盖四个主要管理维度：运营管理、绩效管理、目标管理和人才管理，形成了四维度、20项的医院管理模型。基于CHMS方法，在全国400多家有代表性的医院中抽取科室管理人员开展了调查研究，并对调查结果进行模型验证研究。结果显示，该模型卡方/自由度（CMIN/DF）为2.209，近似均方根误差（RMSEA）为0.039，表现出良好的模型拟合。其它拟合优度指数如GFI，IFI和CFI等均在0.9以上，都符合良好拟合模型的标准。本研究表明，CHMS已经在中国医院管理实践中得到验证，可作为有效的调查方法来测量和评价中国医院管理水平，并为中国医院管理水平的跨国比较提供通用研究平台。 |
| 关键词:医院管理 管理维度 模型拟合 |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目（71773002）；美国中华医学基金会项目（CMB15-217，12-109）；北京大学国家发展研究院波士顿科学基金 |
|
| Study on the establishment of international comparable chinese hospital management survey system |
| CUI Yu-jie1, ZHAO Han-qing2, LIU Guo-en1, HE Yang-yang3, WANG Meng-xiao1, YANG Mao-rui2 |
1. National School of Development, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
2. China Center for Health Economic Research, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
3. Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China |
| Abstract:To understand the management level and international positioning of Chinese hospitals, we developed a comprehensive survey instrument of chinese hospital management survey following the well-adapted methodology of world management survey which has been widely used internationally. The survey was conducted on 20 management practices covering four major management dimensions including operations management, performance management, target management and talent management respectively. Based on the CHMS structure and setting, the four-dimension and twenty-item management model was analyzed with construct validity test. From the test, the middle level managers were recruited from more than 400 chinese national representative hospitals. The results showed that the chi-square/degree of freedom (CMIN/DF) is 2.209, and RMSEA (root mean square error approximate) is 0.039, indicating a good model fitting. The further indications of model fit such as GFI, IFI and CFI were all above 0.9 which is the typical benchmark for model acceptance. This study provides evidence for correspondence between conceptual and empirical hospital management and the insight of model fitting on the current data. The results conclude that CHMS has satisfied validation in Chinese hospital management practices, and can be used as an effective survey method to assess the level of Chinese hospital management and to provide a general platform for international comparison. |
| Key words:Hospital management Management dimension Model fitting |
| 摘要点击次数: 2134 全文下载次数: 1322 |
|
|
|
|
|
