• 首页
  • 创刊词
  • 期刊介绍
    • 杂志简介
    • 编委会
    • 编辑部
  • 过刊浏览
  • 杂志订阅
    • 订阅须知
    • 在线订阅
  • 在线投稿
    • 投稿指南
    • 年度选题
    • 在线投稿
  • 下载中心
  • 学术交流
    • 研究论坛
    • 学术沙龙
    • 编委会会议
  • 登录
    • 作者登录
    • 审稿登录
    • 编辑登录
    • 读者登录
引用本文:欧阳伟, 李青谦.医疗服务在线点评:来自英美两国的经验与借鉴[J].中国卫生政策研究,2018,11(6):74-80
医疗服务在线点评:来自英美两国的经验与借鉴
投稿时间:2017-10-24  修订日期:2018-01-11  PDF全文浏览  HTML全文浏览
欧阳伟, 李青谦
中国人民大学公共管理学院 北京 100872
摘要:随着互联网的快速发展,在线医疗服务点评网站的数量逐渐增加,越来越多的患者使用这些网站分享就诊经验,点评医疗服务的质量或给医生评分,以及搜寻更多关于医疗机构和医生的信息。本文选取了这一领域发展较快的英、美两国作为典型案例,并聚焦英国的NHS Choices和美国的RateMDs、Healthgrades及Yelp网站,主要对其现状、组织、内容、特点、经验和问题分别进行总结与分析。当前,我国医疗服务在线点评方兴未艾,但相关政策和学术研究都很缺乏。本文在借鉴英美两国经验并结合中国国情的基础上,提出由政府主管部门或权威行业协会牵头,组建一个整合健康信息查询、检索及医疗服务点评功能于一体的大型综合性医疗卫生服务平台,通过科学、专业的组织架构对平台实施规范、有序的治理,将主观点评与客观指标、绩效评估相结合,以期提高医疗服务透明度和反应性,推动医疗服务质量提升。
关键词:医生  互联网医疗  英国  美国
Online review of medical services: Experiences from the UK and US and their implications to China
OUYANG Wei, LI Qing-qian
School of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
Abstract:With the rapid development of Internet, the number of online medical service review websites has gradually increased, whereby more and more patients use those engines to share their experience in health treatment, discuss the quality of medical services or rate physicians, and make more researches on medical institutions and doctors just to detailed information on the remedies of their health cases. This paper selected the UK and US as typical cases of countries that have rapidly developed in this field, and focused on UK's NHS Choices and the United States' RateMDs, Healthgrades and Yelp websites. Their current status, organization structure, content, characteristics, experience and problems were analyzed and summarized. At present, China's medical service online review is still in the ascendant, but the relevant policies and academic research are facing scarcity. Based on the situation in China and the experience from the UK and US, this paper proposed policy suggestions as follows: (1) Establishing a national comprehensive medical service platform led by the government or professional and competent association which integrates health information query, retrieval and medical service review functions. (2) Set up a scientific and professional organization structure for standardized and orderly governance. (3) Combining the subjective reviews with objective quality indicators. (4) Adopting performance evaluation, and so on. All of these concerns are proposed in order to improve the medical service transparency and responsiveness, and to promote the medical service quality improvement.
Key words:Physician  Internet medical  The United Kingdom  The United States
摘要点击次数: 1443    全文下载次数: 1017
版权所有:《中国卫生政策研究》编辑部
您是本站第62065213位读者 今日访问3688次
京ICP备10218182号-6

京公网安备 11010502037852号