引用本文:石振宇, 加焱冰, 袁蓓蓓, 孟庆跃, 何平.我国卫生政策与体系研究文献计量分析[J].中国卫生政策研究,2020,13(10):20-26 |
|
我国卫生政策与体系研究文献计量分析 |
投稿时间:2020-06-09 修订日期:2020-09-21 PDF全文浏览 HTML全文浏览 |
石振宇1,2, 加焱冰1,2, 袁蓓蓓2, 孟庆跃2, 何平2 |
1. 北京大学公共卫生学院 北京 100191; 2. 北京大学中国卫生发展研究中心 北京 100191 |
摘要:目的:描述2008—2017年我国卫生政策与体系研究领域相关中英文文章的发表情况,分析我国卫生政策与体系研究的研究能力变化和挑战,提出我国卫生政策与体系研究的发展建议。方法:以泰国卫生部国际卫生研究所提供的检索词为基础,在Scopus、PubMed、Web of Science三个数据库中检索英文文章;中文文章按照标准从《中国卫生经济》和《中国卫生政策研究》中纳入。结果:经过检索及筛选,本研究最终纳入英文文章1 488篇,中文文章3 227篇。2008—2017年,中国相关的卫生政策与体系研究英文文章数量由2008年的72篇增长到2017年的244篇。中英文文章中,发文量前五位的“985工程”高校的优势明显。中英文文章的研究热点一致性较高,且明显体现出我国卫生体系和政策改革的特点。资助方面,受资助的卫生政策与体系研究文章数量越来越多,中文文章的受资助比例由35.06%增长到68.75%;英文文章的受资助比例由47.22%增长到68.03%。受国内资助的文章占比增长明显。结论:近十年来,我国相关的卫生政策与体系研究文章增长迅速,国内研究者的研究能力明显提高,在文章数量增长的同时,应重视研究质量以及政策可行性,从而进一步提高我国卫生政策与体系研究能力。 |
关键词:卫生政策 卫生体系 研究 文献计量 |
基金项目:世界卫生组织资助项目 |
|
Bibliometric analysis on health policy and systems research in China |
SHI Zhen-yu1,2, JIA Yan-bing1,2, YUAN Bei-bei2, MENG Qing-yue2, HE Ping2 |
1. School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; 2. China Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China |
Abstract:Objectives: To analyze the publication status of China-related domestic and English articles in the field of health policy and systems research (HPSR) from 2008 to 2017, to analyze the capacity and challenges, and to propose recommendations for the development of HPSR in China. Methods: Based on the search terms provided by the International Health Policy Program of Thailand, English articles were retrieved in three databases of Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science. For domestic articles, HPSR articles published in Chinese Health Economics and Chinese Journal of Health Policy from 2008 to 2017 were included according to the standards. Results: 1 488 English articles and 3 227 domestic articles were included in this study. From 2008 to 2017, the number of China-related HPSR articles increased from 72 in 2008 to 244 in 2017. In both domestic and English articles, the top five “Project 985” universities which authors affiliated contributed far more than others. The research hotspots of domestic and English articles were highly consistent, and they all exhibited the characteristics of health policy and health system in China. The number of funded HPSR articles increased. The proportion of funded domestic articles increased from 35.06% to 68.75% and the proportion of funded English articles increased from 47.22% to 68.03%. The proportion of domestic funded research increased significantly. Conclusion: During the past ten years, China-related HPSR articles has grown rapidly, and the research capacity of domestic researchers has been greatly improved. Despite the increase in the number of China-related HPSR articles, researchers need to pay more attention to research quality and policy feasibility, so as to further improve the research capacity of China's health policy and system. |
Key words:Health policy Health systems Research Bibliometrics |
摘要点击次数: 1380 全文下载次数: 950 |
|
|
|
|
|