• 首页
  • 创刊词
  • 期刊介绍
    • 杂志简介
    • 编委会
    • 编辑部
  • 过刊浏览
  • 杂志订阅
    • 订阅须知
    • 在线订阅
  • 在线投稿
    • 投稿指南
    • 年度选题
    • 在线投稿
  • 下载中心
  • 学术交流
    • 研究论坛
    • 学术沙龙
    • 编委会会议
  • 登录
    • 作者登录
    • 审稿登录
    • 编辑登录
    • 读者登录
引用本文:余秋静, 曹娜, 陈宗顺, 王培刚.政策工具视角下我国省级层面健康规划政策文本量化分析[J].中国卫生政策研究,2021,14(10):25-30
政策工具视角下我国省级层面健康规划政策文本量化分析
投稿时间:2021-09-23  修订日期:2021-10-15  PDF全文浏览  HTML全文浏览
余秋静, 曹娜, 陈宗顺, 王培刚
武汉大学公共卫生学院/武汉大学人口与健康研究中心 湖北武汉 430071
摘要:目的:分析我国省级健康规划政策文本内容的特点,总结归纳出相关政策文本的优势和弱项,为后续制定和优化健康中国建设的提供政策建议。方法:本文基于政策工具视角,结合健康中国实施的五大战略举措构建二维分析框架,对我国省级的31篇政策文本进行内容分析和量化分析。结果:我国省级健康规划文件中三类基本政策工具呈现环境型政策工具强依赖、供给型政策工具弱依赖、需求型政策工具缺位的差异化使用格局;基本政策工具内部结构缺乏均衡性;五大战略举措的开展具有差异性;政策工具与战略措施之间组合搭配尚需优化。结论:建议加强三类基本政策工具以及政策工具内部运用的均衡性;促进政策工具和具体战略举措的二维整合,提升两者的搭配度;制定可实施、可操作性的政策。
关键词:健康中国2030  政策工具  政策文本  内容分析
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目(21ZDA104)
Quantitative analysis of China's health planning policy texts at the provincial level from the perspective of policy tools
YU Qiu-jing, CAO Na, CHEN Zong-shun, WANG Pei-gang
School of Public Health Wuhan University/Wuhan University Center for Population and Health Research, Wuhan Hubei 430071, China
Abstract:Objective: To analyze the features of China's provincial health planning policy texts, summarize the strengths and weaknesses of the relevant policy texts, and provide references and suggestions for the future policy formulation and optimization for the implementation of Healthy China Initiative. Methods: From the perspective of policy tools, this paper considered the five strategic actions implemented by Healthy China Initiative, constructed a two-dimensional analysis framework, and conducted content analysis and quantitative analysis for 31 provincial policy texts of China. Results: The study found that the three basic policy tools in China's provincial health planning policy documents manifested a pattern of strong dependency on environment-type policy tools, weak dependency on supply-type policy tools, and lack of need for demand-type policy tools. Furthermore, the internal structure of basic policy tools was in lack of balance, the implementations of the five strategic actions were in discrepancy, and the coordination of policy tools and strategic actions was still suboptimal. Conclusion: It is suggested that the balance of the three types of basic policy tools and the balance of their internal application should be reinforced, the two-dimensional integration of policy tools and specific strategic actions should be promoted to improve their extent of matching, and implementable and operable policies should be formulated.
Key words:Healthy China 2030  Policy tools  Policy texts  Content analysis
摘要点击次数: 1387    全文下载次数: 784
版权所有:《中国卫生政策研究》编辑部
您是本站第62348948位读者 今日访问5395次
京ICP备10218182号-6

京公网安备 11010502037852号