• 首页
  • 创刊词
  • 期刊介绍
    • 杂志简介
    • 编委会
    • 编辑部
  • 过刊浏览
  • 杂志订阅
    • 订阅须知
    • 在线订阅
  • 在线投稿
    • 投稿指南
    • 年度选题
    • 在线投稿
  • 下载中心
  • 学术交流
    • 研究论坛
    • 学术沙龙
    • 编委会会议
  • 登录
    • 作者登录
    • 审稿登录
    • 编辑登录
    • 读者登录
引用本文:杜炎秋, 胡凯, 梁笛, 黄葭燕.美国近20年实施对外卫生援助的情况分析[J].中国卫生政策研究,2022,15(6):60-66
美国近20年实施对外卫生援助的情况分析
投稿时间:2022-03-09  修订日期:2022-04-13  PDF全文浏览  HTML全文浏览
杜炎秋1, 胡凯1, 梁笛1,2, 黄葭燕1,2
1. 复旦大学公共卫生学院全球健康研究所 上海 200032;
2. 复旦大学一带一路公共卫生治理研究所 上海 200032
摘要:目的:分析美国实施对外卫生援助的特点,为我国开展对外卫生援助提供参考。方法:本研究基于美国国际开发署的对外援助数据库,从实施部门(横向)和实施时间(纵向)两个维度,定量分析美国实施的卫生援助,分别比较不同维度内的援助渠道、受援地区和健康领域的异同点。结果:2001—2020年,美国实施卫生援助的主要渠道是政府机构、非政府组织、多边组织以及企业渠道。美国本土机构是构成非政府组织和企业渠道的主体。主要援助地区是撒哈拉以南的非洲,主要援助的健康领域是艾滋病防控。美国国务院、国际开发署、卫生与公众服务部是三大出资机构。近三届总统任期内的卫生援助在地区(国家)、健康领域的分布上表现出了一定的一致性。结论:顶层设计上,建议我国继续强化卫生援助在对外政策中的战略定位。实施层面上,建议我国积极动员包括非政府组织、私人企业、科研机构等在内的非国家行为体参与卫生援助,同时强化卫生援助的评估与监管体系。
关键词:卫生援助  非政府组织  健康  美国
基金项目:国家社科基金重大研究专项(20VMG027)
Analysis of the implementation of health assistance by the US in the past 20 years
DU Yan-qiu1, HU Kai1, LIANG Di1,2, HUANG Jia-yan1,2
1. School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China;
2. Global Health Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
Abstract:Objective To analyze the characteristics of the US implementation of health assistance, so as to provide references for the policy-making of China's health assistance. Methods Based on the US Agency for International Development Foreign Aid Explorer(FAE)database, this study quantitatively analyzed the health assistance provided by the US government agencies from the following two dimensions: the department in charge of implementation (horizontal) and the time of implementation (vertical), and analyzed the similarities and differences in the routes, regions and fields of health assistance within each dimension. Results From 2001 to 2020, the US implemented health assistance mainly via government agencies, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO), multilateral organizations and enterprises. Among them, native organizations in the US were the main body of NGO and enterprise routes. The main assisted region was sub-Saharan Africa, and the main assisted health field was AIDS prevention and control. The U.S. Department of State, the Agency for International Development, and the Ministry of Health and Human Services were the three major funding agencies. Healthcare assistance during the last three presidential terms had shown a certain extent of consistency in the distribution of assisting regions and countries and health fields. Conclusions In terms of top-level policy design, it is recommended that the Chinese government continue to strengthen the strategic significance of health assistance in foreign policy. At the implementation level, it is recommended that the Chinese government actively motivate non-state agencies, including NGOs, private enterprises and research institutions, to participate in health assistance, and at the same time strengthen the evaluation and supervision system of health assistance.
Key words:Health assistance  Non-Governmental Organization  Health  The US
摘要点击次数: 379    全文下载次数: 186
版权所有:《中国卫生政策研究》编辑部
您是本站第47773542位读者 今日访问55次
京ICP备10218182号-6

京公网安备 11010502037852号