引用本文:王晓晓, 任建萍, 陈雅婷, 边森森, 司建平, 郭清.社区中医药健康养老服务PPP模式的绩效评价指标体系构建[J].中国卫生政策研究,2023,16(6):37-43 |
|
社区中医药健康养老服务PPP模式的绩效评价指标体系构建 |
投稿时间:2023-04-19 修订日期:2023-06-05 PDF全文浏览 HTML全文浏览 |
王晓晓1,2, 任建萍2, 陈雅婷2, 边森森2, 司建平2, 郭清3 |
1. 河南中医药大学管理学院 河南郑州 450046; 2. 杭州师范大学公共卫生学院 浙江杭州 311121; 3. 浙江中医药大学 浙江杭州 310053 |
摘要:目的:构建社区中医药健康养老服务PPP模式的绩效评价指标体系,为我国社区中医药健康养老服务PPP模式的高质量发展提供参考。方法:采用文献分析法及深入访谈法确定初始指标,采用专家咨询法筛选指标体系并确定指标权重。结果:两轮专家咨询的问卷回收率分别为91.4%和95.2%,专家权威系数均大于0.8,协调系数分别是0.242和0.245(P<0.01),达到一致性检验要求,最终构建了包含4个一级指标、12个二级指标和40个三级指标的绩效评价指标体系。结论:社区中医药健康养老服务PPP模式的绩效内涵具有复杂多维性,所构建的绩效评价指标体系具有科学性,指标的权重具有现实指导意义,但还需进一步优化指标并进行指标验证。 |
关键词:中医药 健康养老服务 PPP模式 绩效评价 指标体系 |
基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目(71874047);杭州市哲学社会科学规划课题成果(M21JC094);河南省软科学研究计划项目(232400410168);河南科技智库中医药强省战略研究基地调研课题(2022-ZYYQS-12) |
|
Establishment of the performance evaluation index system of the PPP model of community traditional Chinese medicine health and elderly care services |
WANG Xiao-xiao1,2, REN Jian-ping2, CHEN Ya-ting2, BIAN Sen-sen2, SI Jian-ping2, GUO Qing3 |
1. School of Management, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou Henan 450046, China; 2. School of Public health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou Zhejiang 311121, China; 3. Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou Zhejiang 310053, China |
Abstract:Objective: To construct the performance evaluation index system of the PPP model regarding community traditional Chinese medicine health care service, and to provide reference for the high-quality development of community traditional Chinese medicine health care service based on PPP model. Methods: Determine the initial index through literature analysis and In-depth interview methods, and screen the index system and determine the index weight with Delphi method. Results: The questionnaire recovery rates of the two rounds of expert consultation are 91.4% and 95.2%, respectively. The expert authority coefficients are all greater than 0.8, with the coordination coefficients being 0.242 and 0.245 (P<0.01), which meet the requirements of consistency test. Finally, a performance evaluation index system including 4 first-level indexes, 12 second-level indexes and 40 third-level indexes is constructed. Conclusions: The performance connotation of the PPP model of community traditional Chinese medicine health care for the elderly service is complex and multi-dimensional. The constructed performance evaluation index system is scientific, and the index weight has practical guiding significance. However, indicators of the index need to be further optimized and verified. |
Key words:Traditional Chinese medicine Health care serviceand elderly care services PPP (Public-private-partnership mode) Performance evaluation Index system |
摘要点击次数: 1416 全文下载次数: 404 |
|
|
|
|
|