| |
我国高校卫生政策与体系研究现状及人才教育培养重点分析
|
| |
| 投稿时间： 2015-07-03 最后修改时间： 2015-07-31 摘要点击次数: 2446 全文下载次数: |
| |
| 引用本文：胡敏, 徐晓程, 茅雯辉,等.我国高校卫生政策与体系研究现状及人才教育培养重点分析[J].中国卫生政策研究,2015,8(10):68-73 |
|
| 胡敏1,2, 徐晓程1,2, 茅雯辉1,2, 张璐莹1,2 |
1. 复旦大学公共卫生学院 上海 200032;
2. 健康风险领域社会风险治理协同创新中心 上海 200032 |
| 基金项目:美国中华医学基金会项目(11-078) |
| |
|
| | 摘要:目的:描述我国高校卫生政策与体系研究(Health Policy and Systems Research,HPSR)现状及能力发展面临的问题与挑战,并提出人才教育培养方面的建议。方法:对我国8所具有代表性的高校中从事HPSR的人员进行定量调查和定性访谈。结果:我国高校从事HPSR的科研人员较为年轻,75.26%具有博士学位,以卫生管理和公共卫生学科背景为主。在研项目分析显示,卫生信息与证据是该领域的主要研究方向,资金投入量和研究者关注度均较高。然而,当前研究资源仍较集中于资深研究者,对青年学者支持力度有限。HPSR以跨领域多学科为特征,但目前机构及个人间的合作较为有限。此外,高校承担的研究项目中仅5.81%转化为政策。讨论与建议:鉴于我国高校HPSR能力方面面临研究者较为缺乏且背景单一、多学科合作受限、HPSR科研投入不足、青年研究者所获资源有限、政策转化能力薄弱等问题。建议在进行高校HPSR人才教育培养过程中,加强本科生和研究生的教学,加强对青年研究者的培训和支持,建立研究成果传播与转化机制。 | |
|
|
关键词:卫生政策与体系研究 人才教育 循证决策
|
| |
| Current situation of Health Policy and System Research and personnel training focuses in Chinese universities |
| HU Min1,2, XU Xiao-cheng1,2, MAO Wen-hui1,2, ZHANG Lu-ying1,2 |
1. School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China;
2. The Innovation Center of Social Risks Governance in Health, Shanghai 200032, China |
| |
|
| | Abstract:Objectives: This study aims to provide a full picture of how Health Policy and Systems Research (HPSR) in Chinese universities. Based on the current situation, analysis of problems and challenges of the HPSR capacity has been conducted and suggestions on personnel training have been proposed. Methods: Quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews have been conducted among personnel engaged in HPSR from 8 representative universities. Results: Most HPSR researchers in the universities are young, of which 75.26% have doctorates and the majority is trained in health care management and public health sciences. Among the current HPSR projects, health information and evidence is the main research direction in this field, and both the capital investment and attention of researchers are high. However, research resources and funding are still currently focused on senior researchers, with limited efforts to support young scholars. HPSR has interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary characteristics, but currently the collaboration among institutions and individuals is relatively limited. In addition, only 5.81% of undertaken HPSR projects have been translated into health policy. Discussion and Suggestions: HPSR researchers in Chinese universities are not sufficient and have similar backgrounds, resulting in limited collaboration. Investment in HPSR projects is still shallow and young researchers are vulnerable in acquiring funding resources. The ability to translate research results into policy is weak. Therefore, this paper suggests to mainstream undergraduate and postgraduate teaching, enhance the training, funding and technical support for young researchers, and to establish the mechanism of dissemination of research findings and their translation into policy. | |
|
|
|
|
