• 首页
  • 创刊词
  • 期刊介绍
    • 杂志简介
    • 编委会
    • 编辑部
  • 过刊浏览
  • 杂志订阅
    • 订阅须知
    • 在线订阅
  • 在线投稿
    • 投稿指南
    • 年度选题
    • 在线投稿
  • 下载中心
  • 学术交流
    • 研究论坛
    • 学术沙龙
    • 编委会会议
  • 登录
    • 作者登录
    • 审稿登录
    • 编辑登录
    • 读者登录
引用本文:王子怡,李亚芳,刘文迪,等.微型卫生技术评估报告规范关键条目的优化与遴选[J].中国卫生政策研究,2025,18(10):75-82
微型卫生技术评估报告规范关键条目的优化与遴选
投稿时间:2025-08-14  修订日期:2025-10-10  PDF全文浏览  HTML全文浏览
王子怡1,2,3,李亚芳1,2,3,刘文迪1,2,3,黄家艺1,2,3,张发强1,2,3,陶俊良1,2,3,朱晔1,2,3,杨克虎1,2,3,李秀霞1,2,3
1.兰州大学卫生技术评估中心/兰州大学循证社会科学研究中心 兰州大学公共卫生学院 甘肃兰州 730000;2.兰州大学循证医学中心 兰州大学基础医学院 甘肃兰州 730000;3.甘肃省循证医学与临床转化重点实验室 甘肃兰州 730000
摘要:目的 构建微型卫生技术评估(Mini Health Technology Assessment,Mini-HTA)报告规范关键条目清单,为Mini-HTA研究报告的各部分撰写提供科学指导,提升其研究报告的规范性、科学性和完整性,从而促进卫生决策的效率和质量提高。方法 结合前期文献调研和定性系统评价,形成Mini-HTA报告规范的问题条目池,发放咨询问卷,利用德尔菲法,通过2轮专家咨询,进行关键条目的优化与遴选。结果 通过两轮德尔菲专家咨询,对初始Mini-HTA报告规范条目清单进行筛选、整合和补充,最终构建涵盖标题、摘要、前言、方法、结果、讨论、结论和其他信息8个一级条目和48个二级条目的Mini-HTA报告规范关键条目清单。结论 构建Mini-HTA报告规范关键条目清单,为Mini-HTA研究报告撰写提供了科学指导,有助于提升评估流程的标准性、透明性和结果的可靠性,从而优化卫生决策的效率和质量。
关键词:德尔菲法  微型卫生技术评估  专家咨询
Mini Health Technology Assessment report standardizes: The optimization and selection of key items
WANG Zi-yi1,2,3, LI Ya-fang1,2,3, LIU Wen-di1,2,3, HUANG Jia-yi1,2,3, ZHANG Fa-qiang1,2,3, TAO Jun-liang1,2,3, ZHU Ye1,2,3, YANG Ke-hu1,2,3, LI Xiu-xia1,2,3
1.Health Technology Evaluation Center/Evidence-based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Gansu 730000, China;2.Evidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Gansu 730000, China;3.Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Gansu 730000, China
Abstract:Objective To construct a key item checklist for the Mini-HTA report specification, providing scientific guidance for drafting each section of Mini-HTA research reports, enhancing their standardization, scientific rigor, and completeness, thereby improving the efficiency and quality of health decision-making.Methods Based on preliminary literature review and qualitative systematic review, a pool of problem items for the Mini-HTA report specification was formed. Delphi questionnaires were distributed, and the Delphi technique was employed through two rounds of expert consultation to optimize and select key items.Results Through two rounds of Delphi expert consultation, the initial Mini-HTA report specification item checklist was screened, integrated, and supplemented. A finalized key item checklist was constructed, comprising 8 first-level items (Title, Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, and Other Relevant Information) and 48 second-level items.Conclusion The constructed key item checklist for the Mini-HTA report specification provides scientific guidance for drafting Mini-HTA research reports. It helps enhance the standardization and transparency of the assessment process and the reliability of results, thereby optimizing the efficiency and quality of health decision-making.
Key words:Delphi method  Mini Health Technology Assessment(Mini-HTA)  Expert consultation
摘要点击次数: 67    全文下载次数: 11
版权所有:《中国卫生政策研究》编辑部
您是本站第63813582位读者 今日访问1710次
京ICP备10218182号-6

京公网安备 11010502037852号