引用本文:于海宁,成刚,徐进,等.我国健康城市建设指标体系比较分析[J].中国卫生政策研究,2012,5(12):30-33 |
|
我国健康城市建设指标体系比较分析 |
投稿时间:2012-08-14 修订日期:2012-11-21 PDF全文浏览 HTML全文浏览 |
于海宁1, 成刚2, 徐进2, 王海鹏2, 常捷2, 孟庆跃2 |
1.山东大学卫生管理与政策研究中心卫生部卫生经济与政策研究重点实验室;2.北京大学中国卫生发展研究中心 |
摘要:本研究选取北京、上海、广州和杭州4个城市作为研究对象,通过查阅各城市的健康城市建设规划,对其所选取的指标体系进行归类、总结,并与WHO的指标体系进行比较。通过比较,得到健康城市指标体系建设的三十项共性指标;然而指标体系不应只包括结果指标,也应包括行动指标,同时建议将政策管理指标也纳入指标体系,对健康城市的建设进行监督指导,旨在为我国其他城市开展健康城市建设,尤其是指标体系的构建提供借鉴。 |
关键词:健康城市 指标 比较分析 |
|
Comparative analysis on indicator systems of healthy cities in China |
|
|
Abstract:This study selected Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Hangzhou as the research objects, through consulting these cities’ healthy city planning, classified and summarized their indicator systems, compared with WHO indicators We found 30 indicators used more in healthy city construction by comparison And, we found that indicator systems should include outcome indicators and action indicators, and we suggested that policy management indicators should be included which can monitor and guide the construction of healthy cities The consequence offered several proposals for other cities’ healthy city planning especially about selection of indicators in future |
Key words:Healthy city Indicator Comparative analysis |
摘要点击次数: 2812 全文下载次数: 5320 |
|
|
|
|
|